Voter Error or Ineffective Ballot?

By Paul S. Hernson

Studies of ballots have traditionally focused on roll-off, candidate order, and partisan advantage. This study is among the first to assess the impact of ballots on individual-level voter errors. We develop new hypotheses by bringing together theoretical insights from usability research and political science about the effects of ballots with and without a straight-party voting option.

 

By comparing voters’ intentions to the votes they cast, we are able to create two new measures of voter errors: votes unintentionally cast for the wrong candidate and unintentional undervotes.

 

Voters generally make fewer errors of both types when using a standard office-bloc ballot than when using an office-bloc ballot with a straight-party option, with the number of wrong-candidate errors substantially exceeding the number of unintentional undervotes. Voters’ background characteristics have a significant impact on their ability to vote without error. Our results offer a new perspective for evaluating the use of the straight-party option. The findings also have implications for public policy beyond their ballot-specific results. The relatively high incidence of wrong-candidate errors among older, less educated, and, evidently, among black voters who use a ballot with a straight-party option has repercussions for civil rights and voter education. They demonstrate that although perhaps not intended, ballot design—like voter identification and registration laws, the allocation of voting equipment, and the financing of campaigns—can increase the political disadvantages of traditionally underrepresented groups.

 

Online Appendix Figure 2. Format of a Standard Office-Bloc Ballot 
AJPS_Hernson_Fig2_Standard Office-Bloc Ballot

Online Appendix Figure A3. Format of an Office-Bloc Ballot with a Straight-Party Option

AJPS_Hernson_Fig3_Office-BlocBallotwStraightPartyOption

 

About the Authors: Paul S. Herrnson is the Executive Director of the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research and is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Connecticut. His article “The Impact of Ballot Type on Voter Errors”, coauthored by Michael J. Hanmer at the University of Maryland and Richard G. Niemi at the University of Rochester, appeared in the July 2012 issue of the American Journal of Political Science. This research was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation of New York.

The American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) is the flagship journal of the Midwest Political Science Association. AJPS is published by Wiley-Blackwell Publishing and supported by the Michigan State University Department of Political Science and the MSU College of Social Science.


Editor-in-Chief, William G. Jacoby

Managing Editor, Robert N. Lupton


Editorial Interns

Miles T. Armaly, Adam Enders

View full editorial board


Impact Factor: 3.269

ISI Journal Citation Ranking:

2014: 4/161 (Political Science)

Online ISSN: 1540-5907

Print ISSN: 0092-5853


Subscribe/Renew
Author Guidelines

Find AJPS Elsewhere

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Editor of the AJPS is at Michigan State University and the Editorial Office is supported by
the Michigan State University Department of Political Science and the School of Social Sciences.

  Michigan State University 
%d bloggers like this: