Peter Loewen: Do Politicians Get Rewarded for Their Legislative Work?

The article, “A Natural Experiment in Proposal Power and Electoral Success,” by Peter J. Loewen, Royce Koop, Jaime Settle, and James H. Fowler, appears in the January 2014 issue of the AJPS. Here, Peter Loewen provides a summary:

Common sense would suggest that politicians should be rewarded for the work they do in a legislature. After all, in the real world we hope that employees get rewarded for doing their jobs. Political scientists are not sure this is the case with politicians, however. After all, voters don’t follow politics closely, especially the finer details of the legislative process. If voters don’t watch their politicians closely, how can they know who to reward and who to punish? There is some evidence to the contrary, however, namely that more active politicians are in fact more richly-rewarded come election time.

Imagine that we did observe all the legislative action politicians took, and we then correlated more action with a greater vote share. This could be evidence of voters rewarding politicians for taking action. But the relationship could also be caused by something else. For example, more talented politicians might be able to take legislative action and earn votes through other means, at the same time. Our paper uses data from a “natural experiment” among the Canadian House of Commons to solve this problem.

In the House of Commons, the right of backbench legislators to introduce legislation is assigned randomly, by means of a lottery. This makes it much like in a laboratory experiment. Because there is no relationship between the right to introduce legislation and a legislator’s ability, we can estimate the independent effect of proposal power (and presumably actual proposals) on electoral success. We find a modest effect – about 3 percentage points in the next election – among members of the governing party. In other words, voters provide some reward for legislative action. Further data analysis suggests that this is because members with the power to propose legislation can use it to cultivate a greater personal vote.

The American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) is the flagship journal of the Midwest Political Science Association. AJPS is published by Wiley-Blackwell Publishing and supported by the Michigan State University Department of Political Science and the MSU College of Social Science.


Editor-in-Chief, William G. Jacoby

Managing Editor, Robert N. Lupton


Editorial Interns

Miles T. Armaly, Adam Enders

View full editorial board


Impact Factor: 3.269

ISI Journal Citation Ranking:

2014: 4/161 (Political Science)

Online ISSN: 1540-5907

Print ISSN: 0092-5853


Subscribe/Renew
Author Guidelines

Find AJPS Elsewhere

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Editor of the AJPS is at Michigan State University and the Editorial Office is supported by
the Michigan State University Department of Political Science and the School of Social Sciences.

  Michigan State University 
%d bloggers like this: